Posts Tagged ‘bloggers’

Run Your Own Twitter Clone: Status.net Launches Public Beta

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Getting Started

To get started, just head over to status.net, sign up for a free account. You can choose between a single user account (good for bloggers and brands), a private network for your company or a public community site. After that, you can customize your site with your own logo and colors. You can also set the character limit for status updates from your users.

Connect to Twitter

Just running your own microblogging network isn’t too exciting unless you are running an internal site for your business, but you can easily connect your Twitter account to your StatusNet site, so that every update from your personal site gets syndicated to your Twitter stream as well. Sending local StatusNet @replies to Twitter is optional.

StatusNet in the Enterprise

StatusNet also offers paid enterprise solutions, with costs ranging from $1,000 to $10,000 per year depending on the features and level of service the customer expects. our Own Alex Williams just took a closer look at the service’s future in the enterprise last week and argued that it “has the features that the enterprise customer wants and it has a strong developer community.”

As of now, StatusNet’s free offering can’t quite replace Yammer or similar products in a business setting, but if you always wanted to set up your own Twitter-like environment, StatusNet now makes it as easy as choosing a URL.

SC bill would get rid of filing law for terrorists

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

COLUMBIA, S.C. — In South Carolina, any group that plans to overthrow the federal government — or any other government in the U.S. — must register its activities.

It’s the law.

Now some state legislators are looking to repeal it.

State Sen. Larry Martin said Monday the 1951 McCarthy-era statute that’s meant to deter communists is one more thing making South Carolina look bad, since bloggers and talk radio picked up on it last month. a misconception spread that the statute, on the books for nearly six decades, had only recently become law.

Legislators said some constituents in this deeply red state were concerned it was aimed at conservative activists.

“Nothing could be further from the truth,” said Martin, R-Pickens. the law was enacted “at a time they thought it was the best response to the communist scare. It’s long outlived its usefulness, if ever it had one.”

His bill to repeal it comes up for debate this week in a Senate panel.

The “subversive activities registration act” requires any group that advocates overthrowing local, state or federal governments to pay $5 and register the group’s name, its leader’s address, beliefs, all members living in South Carolina and check yes or no to the following: “Do you or your organization directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty or necessity of controlling, seizing or overthrowing the government?”

Those that fail to file face up to a $25,000 fine and 10 years in prison. when enacted, it was seen as a way to prosecute someone who gets caught failing to file, instead of having to prove they were fomenting insurrection, Martin said.

“I’m sure Osama bin Laden would be amused,” he added.

Until February, no one had registered, said Secretary of State mark Hammond.

Now, about 10 have filed, apparently in jest, as political commentary. two actually paid the fee, according to his office.

“Our organization is in fact so dastardly that we have refused to remit the fee,” writes someone claiming to represent the Las Vegas-based Alliance of the Libertarian Left.

Other filers include American Citizens for the Extermination of South Carolina, based in “the corner of Fire and Brimstone,” S.C., listing the state’s congressmen as its members. one new York filer chastises the state for having such a silly form, noting his subversive act is voting, while a North Carolina writer asks facetiously — on a letter titled “What??!!!” in big, bold letters — “Why are you only charging $5 for registration?”

“Some folks did fear this could be used in an attempt to squelch their voice,” said state Rep. Eric Bedingfield, R-Mauldin, a co-sponsor of a matching House bill to repeal the law. “To clear up the confusion, let’s just remove it.”

State Rep. Tommy Stringer, the main sponsor, said people panicked unnecessarily about the law restricting civil liberties, particularly since the wording exempts labor unions and patriotic groups that don’t aim to overthrow the government. It also specifies that it does not infringe on free speech rights. People protesting peacefully aren’t subversive, he said.

“What disturbed me was the second part dealing with foreign corporations,” said the Landrum Republican, noting it requires the registration of groups “subject to foreign control,” including corporations financially supported by foreign governments.

“We’re trying to bring business in, not potentially embarrass them for coming here,” he said, calling it — simply — a badly written, unnecessary law.

  • SC Subversive Agent Form:scsos.com/forms/Miscellaneous/SubversiveAgentForm.pdf