by Chris Pollette | March 5, 2010
Just three years after its founding, Twitter has hit 10 billion messages, Chris Gaylord wrote in the Christian Science Monitor. Impressive, isn’t it? in fact, it was just in November 2009 when Twitter had 5 billion messages. Gaylord said the service sees an average of 50 million messages every day, or 600 per second. you can watch the numbers roll up in GigaTweet. they roll in at a blistering pace but it’s fascinating to watch.
Gaylord asked his readers to predict when the 20 billionth tweet would be, but that’s a hard one. after all, Twitter users tend to be a fickle bunch, either sticking with it for long periods or dropping out after just a few messages. the audience skews a little older than other social media such as Facebook.
And then there’s the challenge of newcomer Google Buzz, which is, of course, integrated with Gmail and other tools, though its first days were riddled with privacy issues.
Matthew Shaer wrote a piece in the Christian Science Monitor a few weeks ago about the popularity of Twitter, pointing to numbers from RJ Metrics that said the average user has only 27 followers on Twitter — and the people who stay on the service are more likely to be serious users.
Caroline McCarthy wrote an article a few weeks ago about the possibility that Twitter will get serious regarding advertising strategy, which it may need if it wants to increase revenue beyond what it receives in search deals. Venture capital will only sustain the company so long. There’s also been some discussion that Microsoft may be interested in purchasing the company, though Tom Krazit said CEO Steve Ballmer is holding back for the moment.
How long will Twitter hold out if it goes it alone? Surely someone’s interested in picking up such a large and talkative community of subscribers. will Twitter take a good deal if it’s offered to them?
Tags: Facebook, social media, tweet, tweets, Twitter
Internal code names for tech projects in Silicon Valley and beyond are a celebrated pastime – ranging from the predictable alphabetically-ordered release numbers to fanciful references to family members, vacation spots, animals or practically anything that doesn’t actually describe the product itself. (See Apple code names or Microsoft code names for examples)